Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts

Saturday, April 13, 2013

A case of going broke?

With market volatility making life difficult for equity-driven brokerage houses, the players are scouting for newer, innovative tools. But have their efforts really paid off?

Biologists have applied game theory to explain genetic mutations. Legal arbitrators have used it to understand negotiations. And brokerage houses are fast mastering it to muscle out competition with every means possible. For these brokerage outfits, it is an age where profits talk, survival of the fittest is the style of living, and constant evolution of their model is a necessary deed. But at what cost?

With the market continuing to misbehave, many broking houses that had mushroomed during the great financial markets boom (2004 to 2007) find themselves in a soup. As many as 48 firms were even forced to surrender or shut shops on NSE & BSE between July 2010 and June 2011. And for the lot of 1,800-odd that continue to breathe, most (predominantly dependent on equity broking) are struggling due to the continuous fall in revenue, which during the past two years has been as killing as a 25% drop on a q-o-q basis. This has left them figuring out: “what next?”

On the surface, the situation may not look as bad, because turnover (equivalent to the total values of deals conducted – both institutional & retail) of the domestic equity brokerage industry did grow by 46% in FY2010-11 to touch Rs.339 trillion ($7.48 trillion; as per ICRA). But a look at the particulars give wrinkles to well-wishers. 86% of the turnover during FY2010-11 was contributed by the low-margin derivatives segment (average broking yield of 3-5 basis points). On the other hand, the contribution of the lucrative cash segment (yield of 10-12 bps) continued to decline. As per ICRA, between Q2, FY10 and Q4, FY11, the average daily trading volumes (on BSE & NSE) in the cash segment fell by a high 33% to Rs.161.15 billion. This implied a fall in the share of the cash segment at the exchanges from 26% in Q2, FY10 to just 10% in Q4, FY11. This change in trading mix, coupled with sustained high competition that triggered a price war in a highly fragmented market, dragged down average rate of commission to 0.15% from 0.4%, ensuring a 1 bps fall in brokerage yield y-o-y to the sub-4bps levels in FY2011. In FY2010, the average daily turnover (ADTO) of emerging segments like options and commodities – which were once imagined to fuel growth – grew at 127% and 110% respectively. [Currently the ADTO of commodities is Rs.460 billion, with a broking yield of 1-2 bps or lower.] Another fast-growing segment is called currency trading (in which trading in India started in September 2008 and today, the ADTO is at Rs.450 billion with broking yield between 0.6 to 0.8 bps). These three tools appear attractive, but have not worked in the name of diversification. Reason: ultra-low yields.

Another not-so-successful attempt – in recent years, to create a diversified revenue stream, brokerage houses have ventured into capital market related funding activities. But while this move was expected to earn them money in a sunbathing mode, the outcome has been quite the contrary. The capital market financing book (which consists of margin funding, loan against shares & promoter funding) of 19 large brokerage outfits (tracked by ICRA; which has increased to over Rs.160 billion by March 2011 from Rs.120 billion in March 2010), has taken a beating due to a constant rise in cost of funding (courtesy: RBI’s rate hikes), and the failure to pass on the cost to the clients. Result: return on equity invested for the financing business is down from 15% to 12% (and even this is sans the operating expenses & credit costs).


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

Reserve or reverse, it’s his choice; really!

low growth or inflation; it was a tough choice to be made by the RBI Governor. The problem is, despite a quarterly review of the Monetary Policy, he’s still to make the choice, says Manish K. Pandey
 

It was quite a spectacle on the morning of January 29, 2010, at the RBI headquarters in Mumbai, when a seemingly nervous Duvvuri Subbarao, Governor, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), read out the third quarter review of Monetary Policy 2009-10 in a rather ‘ill-at-ease’ fashion. And why wouldn’t he be? After all, he had a daunting task at hand – to tame price instability without jeopardizing the country’s economic growth. So how did he go about playing with the numbers? While he hiked the cash reserve ratio (CRR) of banks to 5.75% from 5% (this was higher than market expectations of a 50 bps hike on the CRR), he left the repo, reverse repo and bank rates unchanged at 4.75%, 3.25% and 6% respectively. So were these changes enough to guarantee an accomplishment of some sorts?

If one looks at the overnight money market rates, they have remained close to the lower band (3.25%) of the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) for months now, thereby reflecting the huge liquidity bulge. In fact, the banking system has been depositing over Rs.1 trillion on a daily basis under the LAF window during the current fiscal. Considering this, the two-phased hike in CRR (a 50 bps increase on February 13 & the remaining 25 bps increase on February 27), which is expected to squeeze out Rs.360 billion of liquidity from the system, is certainly not going to make much of a difference to the ongoing supply-demand imbalance. Further on, an immediate hike in interest rates is also an unlikely phenomenon (most bankers have already pointed this out). So the moot question is whether Subbarao has given the right twist to the numbers or not.

Explaining his choice of adjusting the CRR than the interest rates, Subbarao says, “If we had used interest rates, it would mean that the amount of liquidity we would have absorbed would have been more unpredictable.” True, but, was there really a need to tamper with any of them? More dangerously, by increasing CRR, hasn’t RBI made both inflation and growth more unpredictable? In fact, RBI has raised both its growth and inflation forecasts. While on one hand, it raised its end-March WPI inflation target to 8.5% from 6.5% earlier, the GDP growth forecast for FY2010 has been raised to 7.5% from 6%!


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Banks are facing a similar predicament today – the lying mirror!

Both public and private banks are facing a similar predicament today – the lying mirror! manish k. pandey discusses the dangers ahead, and how strong numbers during the past quarter were simply, just numbers...

A small data crunching allows us to easily figure out that the net repo volumes (funds kept by banks in aggregate with RBI at a paltry rate of 3.25%), at present stand at a staggering Rs.1.68 trillion. In fact, the situation seems to be touching alarming proportions when one considers how the amount parked under this window is more than double the new incremental deposits (about Rs.620 billion) brought in by the banking system during the year. “Banks fear a rise in non-performing assets (NPAs), so much that they are willing to sacrifice the [negative] differential in deposit rates offered to customers and the interest earned from RBI at reverse repo rates,” says Ashok Jainani, VP, Khandwala Securities. The average rate offered on one-year fixed deposits is about 7.25% currently, while the reverse repo rate is 3.25%! It clearly shows that banks are suffering a killing margin loss of almost 4% for every rupee being kept with RBI; a trend which, if it continues into the next quarter, has the potential to wipe out clean the past year’s profits of many banks within one quarter.

Even if one looks at the broader picture, one can easily figure out that NIMs have been on a declining mode for the last three quarters now. Amit Saxena, CEO, Planman Financial says that there’s worse in the banquet hall – the Incremental LDR (Loan-Deposit Ratio) has already fallen to an eight-year low of 14%. Evidently, the outstanding credit-deposit (CD) ratio of scheduled commercial banks has dropped below 70% for the first time in almost three years (The CD ratio currently stands at 69.01%, the lowest since May 2006 when it stood at 69.89%). Add to this the fact that the credit off-take growth too has come down to 16% – as compared to 25% a year back – and you start wondering whether the house that actually collapsed was insured or not.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012. An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….

IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global

Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face